Introduction

The purpose of this project is to consolidate existing information on Primitive Irish into one comprehensive outline. To fill in the numerous gaps, the author offers speculation and a touch of creativity. The result is a new constructed language, ᚛ᚃᚓᚅᚍᚐᚄ ᚃᚐᚂᚔ᚜ TENGwAS WALI, Tengwah Wālī (lit. "language of Fál"). It's important to note that this conlang is not Primitive Irish itself. While it closely resembles Primitive Irish and is as accurate as an amateur linguist can reasonably achieve, there remains a considerable amount of uncertainty surrounding this reconstruction. As new evidence emerges, such as monumental ogham, manuscript marginalia, or revisions to Indo-European theory, this outline will become outdated. I encourage everyone to conduct their own evidence-based research and draw their own conclusions.

This project was initially inspired by the early write-ups for Galáthach hAthevíu. However, the objective of this project differs from creating a living or modern language like Galáthach. The Goidelic familyhas Modern Irish, Manx, and Scottish Gaelic fulfilling that role. Instead,the aim of this project is to develop a language that 1) agrees with the available Primitive Irish corpus, 2) meets the formal requirements for a descendant of Proto-Celtic and an ancestor of Old Irish, and 3) serves as a usable language capable of expressing any concept expected of a natural language. Essentially, this project aims to capture a snapshot of a language at a specific point in time, describing it on its own terms. Given the scarce attestation of Primitive Irish, a diachronic perspective is crucial for reconstructing something practical. However, whenever feasible, I attempt to present the language from an imagined synchronic standpoint.

On my part, the creation of Tengwah Wālī is driven by a partly sentimental and partly religious motivation. The widespread worship of the Gods of Ireland ceased around the fifth century CE. The major sources of Irish mythology were written during the period of Old Irish, which began around the eighth century. Those intervening centuries witnessed significant changes to the Irish language, making the living and well-documented Goidelic languages quite different from the language spoken by ancient Irish pagans. This project aims to establish a common link between modern Gaelic polytheists and the deities they follow. However, it should be noted that this project, and Tengwah Wālī in general, are not intended to be exclusive to any person or group, and their use outside of this context is encouraged by the author.

This outline will be most useful to those familiar with linguistic terminology and the processes involved in sound change. The International Phonetic Alphabet will be used in the following section and subsequently to introduce and clarify pronunciation.

The primary writing system for Primitive Irish and Tengwah Wālī is Ogham. However, this system is not phonetic and possibly reflects an earlier phonology. During the creation of this outline, I've realized that the writing system itself requires its own lesson. Consequently, in sections where the focus is not on the orthography, I will use a romanization that hopefully represents the language's phonemes. I will also cover allophones and emerging sound changes, as many of these eventually become integral parts of later Gaelic languages. The romanization employed is essentially the one used in David Stifter's "Sengoídelc: Old Irish for Beginners," with some adjustments for readability and renderability.

Furthermore, there is a relatively straightforward transliteration for Ogham, employing Latin equivalents of Ogham characters in capital letters. Here's an example from an attested Ogham inscription [CIIC 160]:

ᚈᚏᚔᚐ ᚋᚐᚉᚐ ᚋᚐᚔᚂᚐᚌᚅᚔ ᚉᚒᚏᚉᚔᚈᚈᚔ 

TRIA MAQA MAILAGNI CURCITTI 

[triː.am ma.kʷam mai̯.laɣ.niː xur.ki.θi]

"of the three sons of Maolán of Cuircthe" 

Additionally, this paper will delve into discussions of grammatical processes, declension, conjugation, sound change laws, and similar topics. I will strive to introduce these concepts gradually and include a comprehensive glossary at the end of the paper. However, providing a complete walkthrough from the ground up would be a task for another project.



Phonology

Proto-Celtic Consonants

 

Labial

Dental

Alveol.

Palat.

Velar

Labiovel.

Nasal

m

n

 

ŋ

   

Plosive

b

t d

 

k g

 

kʷ gʷ

Fricative

ɸ

 

s

 

x

 

Approx.

 

r

j

   

w

Lateral

 

l

       

 

  1. *h1e > *e, *h2e > *a, *h3e > *o
  2. *eh1 > *ē, *eh2 > *ā, *eh3 > *ō
  3. *CHC > *CaC, cf. PIE *ph2ter > PC *ɸatīr (OIr. athir).
  4. *C[stop]HC[stop] > C[stop]C[stop] in non-initial syllables, cf. PIE *dhugh2ter ‘daughter’ > PC *duxtīr (Gaul. duxtir). This development is somewhat uncertain in the light of Celtib. tuateros ‘daughter’ (Gen. sg.).
  5. *TT > *-ss-, cf. PIE *krd-tu- > PCelt. *krissu- ‘belt’; the same development is found in Italic and in Germanic.
  6. *CRHC > *CRaHC (> *CRāC), cf. PIE *plh1no- ‘full’ > PC *flāno- (Olr. lán), PIE *ǵrHno- ‘grain’ > PCelt. *grāno- (OIr. grán). Laryngeals were probably preserved after *Ra until the operation of Dybo’s law (A7), and then lost, with the compensatory lengthening of *aH > *a. The change *CRHC > *CRaC occurred in Italic as well.
  7. *VHC > VC in pretonic syllables (Dybo’s law, cf. Dybo 1961): PIE *wiHro- ‘man’ > PCelt. *wiro- (OIr. fer). In all non-problematic examples of Dybo’s law the laryngeal was lost after *i, *u, or *a which is the result of the development of syllabic resonants before laryngeals (A6). 3 It is assumed here that the laryngeals had already been lost after *e and *o, which were lengthened (A2). Dybo’s law was posterior to the change of CRHC > CRaC (A6) because of the development of *sfraxto- ‘eloquent’, *frati- ‘fern’, and

The sound system of Tengwah Wālī is not an extreme departure from Proto-Celtic. The biggest change is due to intervocalic lenition among consonants. The details of lenition are covered in a later section, but for now it is enough to say that consonants between vowels are weakened directly after a vowel and the result is the lenited consonants marked here in blue.

Tengwah Wālī Consonants

 

Labial

Dental

Alveol.

Palat.

Velar

Labiovel.

Glot.

Nasal

m

 

   

n

 

n͈ **

<n(n)>

 

ŋ

<ng>

       

Plosive

b

 

   

t

 

d

 

 

 

k

 

g

 

<kw>

<gw>

 

Fricative

v~β

<β>

θ

 

ð

<δ>

s (sᵗ)

 

 

 

x

<χ>

ɣ

<γ>

<χw>

ɣʷ

<γw>

h

 

Nasal Fric.

ṽ~β̃

<μ>

                   

Approx.

     

r

 

r͈ **

<r(r)>

j

<y>

w

 

ʍ~ɸ*

<hw>

     

Lateral

     

l

 

l͈ **

<l(l)>

           

*Lenited form of /sw/, also allophone of /w/ in initial position. /ɸ/ tends to occur before front vowels (i, e) and /ʍ/ tends to be found before back vowels (a, o, u).


**Between two vowels, or after a vowel at the end of a word /n/, /r/, and /l/ are lenited and realised as[n], [r], and [l]. If they are in any consonant cluster (-lg-, -skr-, -rl-, wl-, -γn-, etc.) /n/, /r/, and /l/ do not lenite and are realised as "fortis" [n͈], [r͈], and [l͈], i.e. tenser and longer. In the beginning of a word they are fortis by default unless put in a lenition environment. Lenition is discussed further below.


Note 1: With the exception of /s/, all the fricatives (β, θ, δ, χ, γ, χw, γw, and μ) occur only postvocalically as lenited versions of b, t, d, k, g, kw, gw, and m respectively. /s/ lenites to h.

Note 2: /sᵗ/, from P.C. /st/, may or may not have become long /sː/ by the time of Primitive Irish, With the short sibilant, /s/, being lenited or part of a consonant cluster, and the long sibilant being found mostly between vowels, it's not easy to tell if they were both phonemic, or if they were simply allophones by this time. Certainly there are examples like P.C. *astniyos > O.I asna ("a rib") vs. *osnos > onn ("ash-tree"), where *st and *s would have to remain distinct until after *-sn- > *-nn-. However, if ᚎ ("Z", "Straif") represents /sᵗ/ as suggested by McManus, then the use of the letter to represent a distinct phoneme would have ceased by the time of the earliest surviving Ogham inscriptions, such as early 5th century Ahalinsky stone [CIIC 70] which bears the name CUNAGUSSOS /kunaγusōh/ < P.C. *kunogustous. Tengwah Wālī assumes that these clusters had mostly simplified at this point, and that geminate [sː] is the allophone of /s/ in intervocalic position, e.g. senasserah [ˈse.nas.ser.ah] ("elder, ancestor").

Vowels

Tengwah Wālī has about 6 short vowels, 7 long vowels, and 4 diphthongs.

Short Vowels

 

Front

Central

Back

Close

i

 

u

Mid

e

 

o

Open

(æ)*

a

 

Long Vowels

 

Front

Central

Back

Close

 

 

ū

Mid

ē   (ɛ̄)**

 

ō   (ɔ̄)***

Open

ā

 

*Allophone of e /e/ before γ /ɣ/ and γw /ɣʷ/, eg. deγwih [dæɣʲih].

**/ɛ̄/ is the long, open-mid front unrounded vowel. It occurs only before unlenited /g/ and /d/, and is the result of compensatory lengthening (eg. P.C. *dant > dɛ̄d). For the most part however, this will simply be written ē. It can be safely assumed that any segment -ēd- or -ēg- is pronounced [ɛ̄d] or [ɛ̄g] respectively. Any exceptions will be noted.

***Similar to /ɛ̄/, /ɔ̄/ is the allophone of /ō/ before unlenited /g/ and /d/ after compensatory lengthening (eg. P.C. *beronti > berɔ̄di). This will be written as and is restricted to the segments -ōd- and -ōg-.

Note: In addition to the macron (eg. ā) to denote a long vowel, you may rarely see a breve (eg. ă) to denote a short vowel in order to clear up an ambiguity. Both diacritics may be found on one letter in cases where the length is unknown, or to clarify that a rule applies to both the long and the short vowel (eg. ā̆)

Diphthongs

 

with -w

with -y

with a-

aw   āw

ay   āy

with o-

ow

oy

With e-

ēw

 

When preceding a consonant, aw and ow become ō, eg. aw albiyon "from Albion" vs. ō μuμon "from Munster".

Stress

Primary stress occurs at the beginning of a word by default. When stress falls on another part of the word it is marked with an acute < ́>, dīweδū ("at the end") vs. dīwéδū ("I stop"). One major deviation, as suggested in the above example, is in verbs, where stress never falls on the very first prefix and instead falls immediately after (this is covered in the section on verbs).

Secondary stress falls on every other syllable after the primary stress, e.g. kweθurameθah ("fourth").

Phonotactics 

There are two major processes that dominate the phonotactics of Tengwah Wālī. One is lenition, where consonants weaken directly after a vowel. The other is nasalisation, where an /n/ at the end of one syllable is incorporated into the following syllable. There are two major reasons for covering these phonotactical rules in detail. First, Ogham does not mark these changes explicitly, so it’s important to understand when these changes occur in order to distinguish between terms like ᚄᚓᚇᚒ SEDU seδū "I sit" and ᚄᚓᚇᚒ SEDU sɛ̄dū "treasures (du.)". Second, and perhaps more importantly, these mutations have grammatical meaning, and it becomes increasingly important to use those clues when picking apart monsters like  ᚋᚐᚈᚓᚅᚔᚄᚓᚊᚔᚎᚑᚇᚑᚏ MATENISEQISwODOR matenīséχwihwodor "If he will not follow you". Collectively, these partially grammatical processes are known as "mutations" in the linguistics of later Gaelic languages.

Both main processes occur within words, which is fairly unremarkable because it works like any other sound change, for example, CATUS /kaθuh/ "battle" < P.C. *katus, or CEDUS /kɛ̄duh/ "first" < P.C. *kantus. Aside from the ambiguity of the Ogham orthography, there isn’t much going on here. But importantly, these processes also occur across word boundaries and this is where groups of words together can look less familiar. For example, consider the possessive pronouns,

EAS /eah/ "her"

EA /ea/ "his"

EAN /ean/ "their"

When these are applied to a noun, like TEGAS /teγah/ "house", the phrase is treated almost like a single word, with both words being altered. Note the loss of /h/ and /n/ at the word boundary.

EASTEGAS /eaˈteγah/ "her house"

EATEGAS /eaˈθeγah/ "his house"

EADEGAS /eaˈdeγah/ "their house"

Lenition

As mentioned before, lenition occurs directly after a vowel, at the end of a word (eg. aδkwī́eθ "she sees"), at the beginning of a word (eg. indā δelwā "that shape") or inside (kloχā "stone"). It also affects consonants at the beginning of consonant clusters (βrah "phantom"), with a few exceptions noted below.


Normal

 

Lenited

m

μ

nn, (word initial, n /n͈/)

n

b

β

t

θ

d

δ

s

h

k

χ

g

γ

kw

χw

gw

γw

rr, (word initial, r /r͈/)

r

ll, (word initial, l /l͈/)

l

sw

hw

Note 1: In later Primitive Irish /h/ would have only occured in stressed position and in pausa (at the end of an utterance). For example mo hulih "my eye" and nīhákwieθ "does not see", but also dīaμalaθuh "disguise'' < dī- "dis-" + saμalaθuh "resemblance". However, in an earlier period intervocalic -h- must have existed in some form if only for a brief time. The presence of this lenited h (even if it is inaudible) has consequences for some forms of poetry as well as for the process of elision, which is discussed below. For this reason a diaeresuis < ̈ >, is sometimes placed between two vowels where an earlier -h-, and even earlier -s- had existed. Some examples of hiatus are from other lost consonants, e.g. krāäh "stable, enclosure" < P.C *krāφos, thought it is sometimes unclear if some cases are hiatus or simply of diphthong, e.g. oyβā, oïβā ("beauty") < P.C. oφibā.

Note 2: /sk/, /skʷ/ and /sm/ resist lenition as do clusters containing them, eg. tō smeχah "your chin", roteskrī́bāθ "it can scratch you".

Note 3: Lenition of n, l, and r seems to have arisen slightly differently than other sounds. According to McCone "Lenition would appear to have applied to r, l, n except in word-in[i]tial position or in contact with a homorganic consonant (i.e. before t, d and before or after s, r, l, n…"

Nasalisation

Nasalisation occurs directly after /n/. For the sake of simplicity the examples below use ean "their", but any word ending in -n can cause nasalisation. Note how the -n changes value or disappears when combined.


Normal

 

Nasalised

Example

m

mm

ean + makwah > eam makwah "their son"

b

mb

ean + biyaθan > eam biyaθan "their food"

t

d

ean + tenēh > ea denēh "their fire"

d

nd

ean + dēdā > ean dēdā "their teeth"

k

g

ean + kerdā > ea gerdā "their craft"

g

ngg

ean + garmenā > eang garmenā "their cries"

kw

gw

ean + kwennā > ea gwennā "their heads"

gw

nggw

ean + gwenā > eang gwenā "their smiles"

w

ean + wisuh > ean βisuh "their knowledge"

V

nV

ean + ōθan > ea nōθan "their fear"

 

Aspiration

When -h appears at the end of a word, as it often does, it attaches to a following stressed vowel. If the following word begins in a consonant, the -h disappears and the consonant remains unchanged,

eah "her"

kwoh "to, until"

indāh "these (f.)"

ea haθīr "her father"

kwo haδeχwī "until nightfall"

indā henissī "these islands"

ea karēh "her friend"

kwo kaθriχen "to the city, into town"

indā lāμāh "these hands"

Note: If the following syllable is not stressed then aspiration does not occur, as -h- is dropped in unstressed position. Eg. nīëχrédiyū "I do not believe it" < nīh "not" + e "it (acc.)" + kredīyū "I believe", not nīheχrédīyū.

Syncope and Delenition

Though not nearly as common as in Old Irish and later, syncope occurs between broadly homorganic consonants (i.e. consonants with the same or very similar place of articulation) in words of more than two syllables. When this occurs any lenited consonants revert to their normal state. This most often occurs in verbs with a root ending in θ or δ,

aδ-wéδeθ > aδ-wéδθ > aδwḗd "he declares"

to-áre-reθeθ > to-árreθθ > toárred "she overtakes"


But this can occur elsewhere,

Morarīγanī > Morrīγanī "Morrigan"

wohaγeθih > wohγeθih > woχeθih "suffering"

Elision

There are two kinds of elision that are most consequential: 1) consonantal elision, which in this context refers to "disallowed" consonant clusters in the middle or end of a word (aδ-bertā > abertā), and 2) vocalic elision, which refers to the deletion of an unstressed vowel when immediately followed unstressed vowel (sena-aθīr > senaθīr). Stress is an important factor in the process of elision. Most such clusters of vowels or consonants occur when two morphemes come together. If there is a stress boundary (i.e., the second element is stressed) then no elision is necessary. This mostly occurs in verbs (es-réγeθ "it rises"), and sometimes in nouns with productive prefixes (kēdu-éχorih "the first key"). However, as soon as the stress moves away from the second syllable elision takes effect, for example, if the addition of another prefix shifts stress to the left (nīh-és-reγeθ > nīhéreγeθ "it does not rise", wī́ra-χēdu-eχorih > wīraχēdeχorih "the real first key").

Note that in the preceding examples the elision is occuring after the stress, and in these cases it is the first vowel that tends to be dropped. When vocalic elision occurs before the primary stress of a phrase, the second vowel of the pair tends to dropped instead, (wo ea χosī > woa χosī "under his foot"). But not always: embi-en-koμ-áre-ānige > embēgoμárānige ("they encountered one another").

While there is generally no ambiguity about the number of syllables in a word, hiatus between vowels can occur from several historical origins. To clarify that two vowels are part of separate syllables, an umlaut < ̈> is placed over the second syllable. This is also convention in Old Irish resources like eDIL (e.g. O.I. ïaich "salmon (pl.)" < P.I. *eöχeh < P.C. *esokes). The hiatus from intervocalic h is most noticeable in verbs where it occurs often in various endings that would otherwise undergo elision. Hiatus also occurs in cases of historical *φ in P.C. < PIE *p, as in niöh "nephew" < P.C. *neφots < PIE *népōts.

Raising, Lowering, and Rounding

During the period of monumental Ogham vowels were in the process of vowel affections which, like palatalisation, were not yet a phonemic distinction, and also like palatalisation, would go on to form an important part of Old Irish inflection.

Lowering is the most common effect. When an open vowel a, ā, e, ē, o, stood in the following syllable the close vowels and were lowered closer to e and o respectively (perhaps realised intermediately as [i̞~ɪ] and [u̞~ʊ]*). For example wirah "man" might be realised as [ʍɪrah], and in fact in O.I. the lowering was complete, yielding fer. Long vowels were not affected, wīrah "true" > O.I. fír.

Raising is slightly more restricted in its occurrence and the exact rules are not fully known yet. In general it is like the opposite of lowering. The open vowels e and o are raised closer to i and u respectively. For example mori "sea" might be realised as [mʊrʲi], and in fact in O.I the raising completed here as well, yielding muir.

A labiovelar (i.e. kw, gw, χw, γw) can cause the following, short i or a to become rounded to u and o respectively. For example kwariyah [kʷœrʲijah] or [kʷorʲea]. However this would have been a fairly late development un Primitive Irish As it must have occurred after the complete raising of words like gweδiθi "prays" > gwiδiθi > O.I. guidid, and after the complete lowering of words like kwrināθi "buys" > kwrenaθi > O.I. crenaid.

*Though not necessarily! For a comparable situation in Latin, in which intermediate vowel qualities are called into question, see Calabrese, A. (2003)

Palatalisation

Because Primitive Irish did not exhibit syncope or apocope until just before the Old Irish period, there are no minimal pairs involving palatalisation (known in Modern Irish as "slender" consonant as opposed to "unpalatalised", "velar" or "broad" consonants. It is possible, however, that consonants were in fact palatalised before front vowels as is the case in the modern Gaelic languages, but it would not have been a grammatical feature. For Tengwah Wālī, I will not be marking palatals in broad transcription, eg. /iniγenā/, but it may show up in narrower transcription, eg. [ˈi.nʲi.ɣʲe.naː]. The rule for palatal consonants would be slightly different than in modern times and may in fact be too complicated for this introduction (see McCone 1996). Here is a brief rundown of McCones rules for "first palatalisation" which is the stage that had definitely begun by the period of monumental Ogham:

1) "The first palatalisation, then, affected a single consonant (and mb, nd, ng) between two front vowels or between any vowel (except ā; see below) and high front i/ī...

between two front vowels:

between back vowel and i, :

but unpalatalised,

2) "...unlike its voiced counterpart, a voiceless dental stop/fricative was palatalised between â and iy (as opposed to i/î without y)."

but unpalatalised,


3) "When the preceding vowel was stressed and rounded, there was no palatalisation of a labial or guttural con-sonant between this and i/ī but palatalisation of any other single consonant (or nd) did occur…"

but unpalatalised,


4) "Between an unstressed vowel and a back vowel (s)siy-  seems to have been simplified to -sy- and then -s- before palatalisation…" (this mostly applies to relative clauses in verbs and is more of an historical development than a conditioned rule)